Ramu alias Ramasamy v. Arumuga Naicker
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court; CRP No. 2086 of 2026; CMP.No.9238 of 2026; Abdul Quddhose J.; decided 27-07-2026. Subject: maintainability of Article 227 revision petition for striking out an entire plaint versus rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as alternative remedy. Precedent relied on: P.Suresh v. Kalaivanai, 2026 SCC Online SC 143 (Supreme Court). Petitioners (defendants in suit): Ramu alias Ramasamy S/o Elumali Naicker and Kala; respondent (plaintiff): Arumuga Naicker; suit O.S.No.232 of 2025, Sub Court, Maduranthakam; suit alleged to be abuse of process of law. Outcome: CRP disposed of as not maintainable; liberty to file Order VII Rule 11 CPC application before Sub Court, Maduranthakam; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition disposed of as not maintainable; liberty granted to the petitioners to file an application under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C before the Sub Court, Maduranthakam seeking rejection of the plaint in O.S.No.232 of 2025; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.