Dismissed¶35

R.Raja alias Singaraj v. The inspector of police

Madras HC9 Feb 2026CRL RC(MD)/577/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal on compromise: criminal revision (Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.) challenging the 22.02.2019 order of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur in Crl.M.P.No.6244 of 2018 was dismissed as withdrawn after petitioner R.Raja @ Singaraj's counsel (K.Manoharan) endorsed that the parties had ended in compromise and nothing survived; the State (Additional Public Prosecutor A.Thiruvadi Kumar) concurred; connected petitions Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7254 and 7255 of 2019 closed; underlying case C.C.No.35 of 2018, Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District; decided by Mohammed Shaffiq, J., Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, on 09.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's counsel's compromise endorsement; connected miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶35

R.Raja alias Singaraj Vs The inspector of police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.R.C(MD)No.577 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

CRL.R.C.(MD)No.577 of 2019

¶7

and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.7254 and 7255 of 2019

R.Raja @ Singaraj

... Petitioner

vs.

The Sate of Tamil Nadu, Represented through its, Inspector of Police, Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District. C.C.No.35 of 2018.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.6244 of 2018, dated 22.02.2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur and set aside the same as illegal.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manoharan

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶16

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.R.C(MD)No.577 of 2019

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Heard Mr.K.Manoharan, learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner

¶22

and Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent.

¶23

This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order passed by Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur in Crl.M.P.No.6244 of 2018, dated 22.02.2019.

¶24

3. Mr.K.Manoharan , learned Counsel for Revision Petitioner

¶25

would submit that nothing survives for further adjudication in the present

¶26

petition. He also made the following endorsement:

¶27

“In the instant Criminal Revision case, the parties ended in compromise. Hence, the further proceedings in the instant Criminal Revision case nothing survives. Hence, I may be permitted to withdraw the petition.”

¶28