The Court condoned a delay of 74 days in filing a restoration petition by the petitioner. The respondent had no objection to the condonation of delay. The restoration petition was listed in the usual course.
The delay of 74 days in preferring a restoration petition is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.(MD)No.12444 of 2025 in Tr.CMP(MD).No.39 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
CMP.(MD)No.12444 of 2025
Heard Mr.S.Balaji, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.K.S.Kathiravan, learned Counsel for the respondent.
Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 74 days in preferring a restoration petition to restore the Tr.CMP(MD).No.39 of 2025 dated 04.04.2025.
the same in the usual course.
09.02.2026
gvn
1/2
CMP.(MD)No.12444 of 2025
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gvn
C.M.P.(MD)No.12444 of 2025 in Tr.CMP(MD).No.39 of 2025
09.02.2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 74 days in preferring a restoration petition can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
respondent
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
