Dismissed¶19

J.Arockia Vimal v. State represented by The Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jun 2026CRL RC/1123/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn - CRL RC No. 1123 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Madras, Shamim Ahmed J., order dated 22-06-2026. Petitioner J.Arockia Vimal sought withdrawal of revision challenging order dt. 05.08.2024 in C.C.No. 306/2024 (Additional Mahila Judicial Magistrate Level, Alandu); originating from Crime No.05 of 2015, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai. Interim stay, if any, vacated. Counsel: K.Balasubramaniam for petitioner; M.Dinesh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side), for the State. No issues argued, no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case; interim stay, if any, granted by this Court stands vacated. ¶19

J.Arockia Vimal Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL RC No. 1123 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL RC No. 1123 of 2026

¶6

J.Arockia Vimal S/o. M. Jeyaseelan Permanently residing at B1, Trishna Homes Vasu Nagar, Bharthiyar Nagar 4th Street, S.S. Colony, Madurai-625 016.

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

State represented by The Inspector of Police W-32, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai. Crime No.05 of 2015

¶10

..Respondent(s)

¶11

Prayer: To call for the records in C.C.No. 306/2024 on the file of The Additional Mahila (Judicial Magistrate Level) Alandu and set aside the order dt. 05.08.2024 by allowing this Revision and thus render justice.

¶12

For Petitioner(s): MR.K.Balasubramaniam For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Dinesh Government Advocate (Criminal Side )

¶13

Page1 of 3

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRL RC No. 1123 of 2026

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr. K. Balasubramaniam,

¶18

the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner does not want to press this Criminal Revision Case and seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an explicit endorsement to that effect in the case bundle today.

¶19

2.Recording the said submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed as withdrawn. Interim stay, if any, granted by this Court stands vacated.

¶20

22-06-2026

¶21

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶22

SHA

¶23

¶24

1.The Inspector of Police W-32, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai.

¶25