Dismissed¶21

J.Saratha v. K. Bhupathy

Madras HC22 Jun 2026CRL MP/5864/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Shamim Ahmed J., order dated 22-06-2026 in CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026 in CRL RC SR No.16513 of 2026, J. Saratha v. K. Bhupathy — withdrawal of Criminal Revision against proclamation order dated 20.11.2025 in S.T.C.No.1/2016 (Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1, Erode) following an out-of-Court compromise between the parties; condonation of 21-day delay and setting aside of proclamation not decided; both matters dismissed as withdrawn at the SR stage; interim stay vacated. Counsel: Mr. Sanjay Davidson for petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw; Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn (revision at the SR stage itself), with interim stay, if any, vacated. No relief on merits. ¶21

J.Saratha Vs K. Bhupathy — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026 in CRL RC SR No.16513 of 2026

¶6

J.Saratha

¶7

..Petitioner(s) in both cases

¶8

Vs K. Bhupathy S/o.Kumarasamy, No.10, Iteria Avenue II, Thindal, Erode Taluk, Erode.

¶9

..Respondent(s) in both cases

¶10

Prayer CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026: To condone the delay of 21 days in filing the above Criminal Revision petition preferred against proclamation order dt. 20.11.2025 in S.T.C.No. 1/2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1 Erode.

¶11

Prayer in CRL RC SR No.16513 of 2026: To set aside the Proclamation order dated 20.11.2025 in S.T.C.No.1 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.1, Erode.

¶12

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sanjay Davidson

¶13

__________ Page1 of 3

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel

¶18

appearing for the petitioner submits that the parties have amicably entered into a compromise outside the Court.

¶19

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the learned counsel submits that he does not want to press this Criminal Revision Case and seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the same. He has also made an explicit endorsement to that effect in the case bundle today.

¶20

Recording the said submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

Consequently, Criminal Revision Case also stands dismissed as withdrawn at the SR stage itself. Interim stay, if any, granted by this Court, stands vacated.

¶22

22-06-2026

¶23

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶24

SHA

¶25

__________ Page2 of 3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CRL MP No. 5864 of 2026