Bail petitions under Cr.No.4/2025 before the Madurai Bench. The Additional Public Prosecutor stated the case was on the verge of trial; recording that submission, both petitions were dismissed without further conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 20/02/2026
PRESENT
The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
CRL OP(MD). Nos.9544 and 8644 of 2025
Pratyash Mohanty, ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9544 of 2025
Priyabhat Mohanty ... Petitioner/Accused in Crl.O.P(MD).No.8644 of 2025
Vs
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Nib-Cid, Ramnad Police Station, Ramnad District. Cr.No.04/2025..
... Respondent/Complainant in both Crl.O.Ps
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sakthi Rao, (in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9544 of 2025) For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sudhagar (in Crl.O.P(MD).No.8644 of 2025) For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) (in both Crl.O.Ps)
1/3
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS
PRAYER :-
For Bail in Cr.No.4 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the case is on the verge of trial.
Original Petitions are dismissed.
tta
TO
2/3
S.SRIMATHY,J
tta
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD). Nos.9544 and 8644 of 2025
Date : 20/02/2026
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pratyash Mohanty
Priyabhat Mohanty
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Nib-Cid, Ramnad Police Station, Ramnad District
S.Srimathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
