Disposed¶23

R.Seenivasan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC12 Jan 2026CRL OP(MD)/641/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL OP(MD) No.641 of 2026; Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; decided 12.01.2026; L. Victoria Gowri, J.; petitioner R.Seenivasan; respondents include Superintendent of Police Dindigul, Inspector of Police Ambiligai Police Station, R.Velusamy and M.Yogasudhakumar; petition sought police protection based on representation dated 15.12.2025; civil dispute between petitioner and respondents 3 and 4; police enquiry closed advising parties to pursue remedy before appropriate civil Court; Criminal Original Petition closed, no direction issued.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the Court closed the Criminal Original Petition. ¶23

R.Seenivasan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.641 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 12/01/2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.641 of 2026

R.Seenivasan

... Petitioner

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Ambiligai Police Station, Ambiligai, Ottanchatram, Dindigul District.

¶12

3.R.Velusamy

¶13

4.M.Yogasudhakumar ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

To direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to give necessary police protection for the petitioner and his family members for their life and limbs by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.12.2025, within the period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Haja Mohideen Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRL OP(MD). No.641 of 2026

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the first respondent to direct the second respondent to give necessary police protection for the petitioner and his family members for their life and limbs by considering the petitioner's representation dated 15.12.2025, within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶21

Learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that there is

¶22

a civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4. In this regard, an enquiry has been conducted on the petitioner's representation. Both parties have appeared and by directing them to work out remedy before the appropriate Court, the enquiry was closed.

¶23