Veerappan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, K.Puduppatti

The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner joining hands with other accused, attacked the defacto complainant and another and caused severe injuries to them. Hence, the case.

¶27

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that one of the co-accused already released on bail. The injured was discharged from the hospital. Though the petitioner has one previous case, it is only for 506(ii) IPC. He is in custody from 14.06.2026 and ready to abide any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

¶28

The learned Counsel appearing for the State reiterated the prosecution

¶29

case and reported that the petitioner has one previous case. The main accused in this case is still absconding. He opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶30

This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on

¶31

record.

¶32

2/5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12827 of 2026

¶35

6.

¶36

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, though the petitioner has one previous case, the injured was discharged from the hospital, the co-accused was also released on bail vide order dated 25.06.2026 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11938 of 2026 and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions.

¶37

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District , and on further conditions that:

¶38

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

¶39

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

¶40

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶41

3/5

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12827 of 2026

¶44

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any

¶45

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the

¶46

Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶47

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

¶48

Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730].

¶49

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(K R S J) 30.06.2026

TM

To