Suku Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

The case of the prosecution is that on 15.06.2026, when the respondent went on surveillance, the petitioner along with other accused persons involved in illegal transportation of one unit of M-sand. Hence, the case.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

¶26

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the offences are grave in nature. The accused persons are involved in illegal transportation of valuable minerals. On the basis of the confession statement of the co-accused, this petitioner has been implicated in this case. The petitioner has 2 previous case. Investigation is still pending. He vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶27

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶28

2/5

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11939 of 2026

¶31

Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, considering the quantity and nature of

¶32

minerals involved in this case, the petitioner was implicated in this case on the basis of the confession statement of the co-accused, though the petitioner has two previous cases, already in those cases he was granted anticipatory bail and considering all other facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶33

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail

¶34

in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy , on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶35

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police at 10.30 a.m., on every Saturday for a period of four weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation:

¶36

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

¶37

3/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11939 of 2026

¶40

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation

¶41

or trial.

¶42

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶43

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned

¶44

Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

¶45

Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶46

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be

¶47

registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

¶48

(P D B J) 23.06.2026

¶49

TM

¶50

To