Dhaneshkumar v. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC, C. Kumarappan J., 21-04-2026, CRL OP 9228/2026: regular bail pending investigation under S.483 B.N.S.S. for alleged POCSO offences (SS.5(l), 5(j)(ii), 5(n), 6(1)) in Crime No.8/2026, AWPS Poonamallee, Avadi City; petitioner in relationship with minor victim; victim's magistrate-recorded statement under S.183 B.N.S.S. showed no forcible sexual assault, only an affair; bail granted on Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties before POCSO Special Court, Tiruvallur; stringent conditions incl. twice-daily reporting for 15 days, breach clause per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005) 13 SCC 283, fresh FIR under S.269 B.N.S. on absconding.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner enlarged on bail pending investigation in Crime No.8/2026 on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvallur, with conditions: sureties to affix photographs and left thumb impression (Judicial Form No.46, Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019) with identity proof; petitioner to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. for 15 days and thereafter as and when required; not to abscond; not to tamper with evidence or witness; breach to attract appropriate orders per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; fresh FIR registrable under Section 269 of B.N.S. if the accused absconds.