Disposed¶23

K. Kottai Mohamed Faizan v. The Inspector of Police (Crime)

Madras HC8 Apr 2026CRL OP/8875/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL OP No. 8875 of 2026; Madras High Court; Justice M. Nirmal Kumar; decided 08-04-2026; Section 528 BNSS; police harassment petition; non-interference in civil and commercial money disputes; Elephant Gate Police Station C-2; Huda Enterprises; M.N.Electricals; Mukeshkumar Mehatha; Rs.31,24,333/-; undertaking to repay within 6 months; complaint closed as money transaction; insolvency proceedings before National Company Law Board and Tribunal; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

In view of the facts recorded (including that the complaint was closed as a money transaction after the petitioner's undertaking), the criminal original petition is disposed of; no express direction or reasons are recorded in the order. ¶23

K. Kottai Mohamed Faizan Vs The Inspector of Police (Crime) — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL OP No. 8875 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

CRL OP No. 8875 of 2026

¶7

K. Kottai Mohamed Faizan S/o. Kottai Abdul Rahman, No.31, Diwan Rama Road, Purasaiwakkam,Chennai-600 084.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The Inspector of Police (Crime) C-2, Elephant Gate Police Station, Wal Tax Road, Chennai-600 001.

¶11

..Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER: This criminal original petition filed under Section 528 BNSS to direct the Respondent to not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry by interfering with the civil and commercial money disputes and thus render justice.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Y.Kajanavas

¶14

For Respondent(s): Mr.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the Respondent to

¶17

not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry by interfering with the civil and commercial money disputes.

¶18

Page1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRL OP No. 8875 of 2026

¶21

2.The facts of the case is that the petitioner is a Proprietor of Huda Enterprises. During the course of business between the year 2020-2021, there was a business dispute between the petitioner and the Mukeshkumar Mehatha, Proprietor of M.N.Electricals. The petitioner’s company was eroded in its business and the same was shut down and insolvency proceedings were pending before the National Company Law Board and Tribunal.

¶22

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that one Mukeshkumar Mehatha, Prorietor of M.N.Electrical lodged a complaint against the petitioner stating that he received a sum of Rs.31,24,333/- for supply of electricals items. Therefore, the respondent police called and enquired the petitioner and the petitioner has given an undertaking to return within a period of 6 months. Thereafter only, the respondent police closed the complaint as there was a money transaction.

¶23

4.In view of the above, the criminal original petition is disposed of.

¶24

08-04-2026

¶25

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms

¶26

__________ Page2 of 4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CRL OP No. 8875 of 2026