Dismissed¶20

R.Ramesh v. The State Rep. by its Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jan 2026CRL OP/34481/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of quash petition; dismissal as withdrawn with endorsement; dispensation of personal appearance of accused before trial Court; exceptions for receipt of copies, answering charges, Section 313 CrPC questioning and judgment; representation by counsel; Section 528 BNSS petition; C.C.No.9777 of 2017; Crime No.369 of 2008 CCB Vepery; Metropolitan Magistrate Egmore; Madras High Court 07.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected Crl.M.P.Nos.24157 & 24158 of 2025 closed; personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date as required by the trial Court, with the petitioner to be duly represented by counsel. ¶20

R.Ramesh Vs The State Rep. by its Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether the Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of C.C.No.9777 of 2017 should proceed or be permitted to be withdrawn. +1 more

¶18

Court's answer

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and consequently the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

Ratio / Principle

On the request of the petitioner's counsel, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date required by the trial Court; the petitioner shall be duly represented by their counsel before the trial Court.

¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.) — Crl.O.P.No.34481 of 2025 under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by R.Ramesh seeking quashing of C.C.No.9777 of 2017 (arising out of Crime No.369 of 2008, CCB, Vepery, Chennai) pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate Exclusive for trial of CCB and CBCID Metro cases, Egmore. When taken up for hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with an endorsement to that effect, and sought dispensation of the petitioner's personal appearance before the trial Court. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected Crl.M.P.Nos.24157 & 24158 of 2025, while dispensing with the petitioner's personal appearance except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date required by the trial Court; the petitioner to be duly represented by counsel before the trial Court.

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.34481 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07.01.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.34481 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.24157 & 24158 of 2025

R.Ramesh

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, CCB, Vepery, Chennai. (Crime No.369 of 2008)

¶11

Upasana Finance Limited, having registered office at No.98A, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. Represted by H.Subramaniyan ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to call for the records in C.C.No.9777 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Exclusive for trial of CCB and CBCID Metro cases, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Vimal B.Crimson For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R2 : No appearance

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.34481 of 2025

¶18

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. Further,

¶19

he sought the indulgence of this Court, to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court.

¶20

2 . In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. However, according to the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., passing of judgment, or any other date as may be required by the trial Court. It is made clear that t he petitioner shall be duly represented by their counsel before the trial Court.

¶21

07.01.2026

¶22

vkr

¶23

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl.O.P.No.34481 of 2025