Dismissed¶26

Vasudevan.M v. the State Represented by, Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jan 2026CRL OP/31993/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; Crl.OP.No.31993 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.22164 of 2025; A.D. Jagadish Chandira J.; dated 07.01.2026; petition under Section 528 BNSS 2023 to quash FIR Crime No.180 of 2025, Inspector of Police, Anakkavoor Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District; petitioners Vasudevan.M, Vimala, V.Santhiya; respondent Sampath; investigation complete, final report in C.C.No.807 of 2025, Judicial Magistrate Cheyyar; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition challenging final report; miscellaneous petition closed.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging the final report in C.C.No.807 of 2025, if aggrieved; connected miscellaneous petition Crl.MP.No.22164 of 2025 closed. ¶26

Vasudevan.M Vs the State Represented by, Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.OP.No.31993 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07.01.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

Crl.OP.No.31993 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.22164 of 2025

¶7

Vasudevan.M

¶8

Vimala

¶9

V.Santhiya

¶10

...Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

The State represented by, Inspector of Police, Anakkavoor Police Station. Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.181 of 2025.

¶13

Sampath ...Respondents

¶14

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the entire records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.180 of 2025, pending on the file of the 1^st respondent i.e., The Inspector of Police, Anakkavoor Police Station, Tiruvanamalai District and the quash the same.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.OP.No.31993 of 2025

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Baaskaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA(Crl. Side), for R1 : No Appearance, for R2

¶19

ORDER

¶20

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the 1^st respondent submitted that though the petitioners have come up with this criminal original petition seeking quashment of the FIR in Crime No.180 of 2025, pending on the file of the 1^st respondent, investigation in this case has already been completed and a final report came to be filed in C.C.No.807 of 2025 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar.

¶21

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal original petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the said final report. An endorsement to the said effect was also made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the petition today.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.OP.No.31993 of 2025

¶25

In view of the above, this criminal original petition stands

¶26

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging the said final report, if so aggrieved. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.01.2026

skt

To: