K.Vinothan v. State Represented by The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court single-judge bail order (C.Kumarappan J.) in K.Vinothan v. State (Oragadam PS, Kancheepuram), Crl.O.P.No.19197 of 2026 dated 20.07.2026: mobile-phone robbery case under Sections 309(6) and 311 BNS 2023; bail allowed despite four previous cases, weighing period of incarceration, recovery of the stolen mobile phone and substantially completed investigation; strict conditions including twice-daily police reporting for 60 days; P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283] applied on breach consequences; fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS 2023 if petitioner absconds.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted: petitioner to be released on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur, subject to conditions - surety photographs/left thumb impressions with identity proof; reporting before respondent police twice daily (10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m.) with no relaxation petitions entertained for 60 days; no absconding or tampering with evidence/witnesses; breach actionable as per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; absconding attracts fresh FIR under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.