Dillidurai Vs Stae by, The Inspector of Police

State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Team No.8, Central Crime Branch (CCB), Tambaram City Police, Sholinganallur, Tambaram Commissionarate. Crime N0.94/2026

¶10

..Respondent(s)

¶11

PRAYER

¶12

To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police in Crime. N0.94/2026 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Thirumoorthy D For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This matter is listed today under the caption “For Being Mentioned” at

¶16

the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶17

Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL OP No. 11675 of 2026

¶20

I have heard the learned counsel on both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶21

It is brought to the notice of this Court that, while the order dated 03.06.2026 passed in Crl.O.P.No.11675 of 2026 granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, the concerned satisfaction court was erroneously mentioned as the “learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram”, instead of the “learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram”. Accordingly, the Paragraph No.7 in the order dated 03.06.2026 passed in Crl.O.P.No.11675 of 2026, is modified as follows:

¶22

“7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to

¶23

be released on anticipatory bail in the event of

¶24

arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order

¶25

copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram, on condition that

¶26

the petitioner shall executed a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with

¶27

two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further

¶28

conditions: ”

¶29

__________ Page2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CRL OP No. 11675 of 2026

¶32

In view of the above, the Registry is directed to carry out the necessary

¶33

corrections by substituting the revised Paragraph No.7 in place of the original paragraph and issue a fresh order copy forthwith.

¶34

Consequently, the petitioner is granted a further period of one week

¶35

from the date on which the order copy is made ready for production of sureties and compliance with the anticipatory bail conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.11675 of 2026, dated 03.06.2026.

¶36

15-06-2026

¶37

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶38

dpa

¶39

Note: Issue order copy by 15.06.2026

¶40

To

¶41