Allowed¶25

Balamurugan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruppuvanam

Madras HC2 Jan 2026CRL MP(MD)/20444/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Section 528 BNSS; relaxation/modification of bail-related condition; daily appearance replaced by weekly Monday appearance at 10.30 a.m.; compliance affirmed; Crl.MP.(MD).No.20444/2025; Crl.MP.(MD).No.13554/2024; Crl.A.(MD).No.1096/2024; Crime No.286/2001; Thiruppuvanam Police Station; Sivagangai District; petitioner Balamurugan vs State of Tamil Nadu; Judge N. Mala; order dated 02/01/2026; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; condition of daily appearance relaxed — petitioner directed to appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. ¶25

Balamurugan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruppuvanam — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.MP.(MD).No.20444/2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated :02/01/2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

Crl.MP.(MD).No.20444/2025 in Crl.A.(MD).No.1096/2024

¶7

Balamurugan ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its The Inspector of Police Thiruppuvanam Police Station Sivagangai District. [crime No.286/2001] ... Respondent

¶10

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to relax the condition imposed in Crl.MP.(MD).No.13554/2024 in Crl.A. (MD).No.1096/2024 dated 10.10.2025.

¶11

For Petitioner : Ms.A.S.Rajeswai For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Crl.MP.(MD).No.20444/2025

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(1)The present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2025 in Crl.MP. (MD).No.13554/2024 in Crl.A.(MD).No.1096/2024.

¶17

(2)The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court, vide order dated 10.10.2025, directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is abiding the said condition till date and hence, seeks relaxation of the aforesaid condition.

¶18

(3)The learned Additional Public Prosecutor also affirmed the compliance of the conditional order by the petitioner, till date.

¶19

(4)Heard both sides.

¶20

(5)Considering the fact that the petitioner is complying with the conditional order dated 10.10.2025, till date, this Court is of the view that the condition imposed on the petitioner, be modified.

¶21

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.MP.(MD).No.20444/2025

¶24

(6 )Accordingly, the petition is

¶25

(6 )Accordingly, the petition is ordered and the petitioner is directed to

¶26

appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶27