Petition to relax a bail condition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to file the required undertaking affidavit with sureties, though he complied with the daily-reporting condition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 22.07.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
Ranjith
... Petitioner
Vs
State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Viruveedu Police Station, Dindigul District.
... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.7727 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No. 676 of 2025 on 08.04.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For Respondent : Mrs.V.Moushica, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to relax the condition imposed
on the petitioner by this Court in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.7727 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025 on 08.04.2026.
1/4
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
22.07.2026
ogy
2/4
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
To
3/4
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14519 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.676 of 2025
22.07.2026
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition imposed in an earlier bail-related order should be relaxed despite non-compliance with condition No.6(ii).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjith
State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Viruveedu Police Station, Dindigul District
B. Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
