Allowed¶36

M. Mohammed Asraf Ali v. a. Chandrasekar

Madras HC11 Jun 2026CRL MP/8065/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delay condonation of 1486 days in filing Criminal Revision; Madras High Court; Shamim Ahmed J.; CRL MP No. 8065 of 2026 in CRL RC SR No. 11760 of 2026; against judgment dated 16.12.2019 of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode; compromise between parties; entire cheque amount Rs.9 lakhs paid to respondent; Joint Compromise Affidavit on record; section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act; petitioner M. Mohammed Asraf Ali; respondent A. Chandrasekar; posted for Final Hearing/Admission on 19.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 1486 days in filing the Criminal Revision condoned; Office directed to allot regular number to the Revision; case posted for Final Hearing/Admission on 19.06.2026. ¶36

M. Mohammed Asraf Ali Vs a. Chandrasekar — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRL MP No. 8065 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED

¶6

CRL MP No. 8065 of 2026 in CRL RC SR NO. 11760 OF 2026

¶7

M. Mohammed Asraf Ali S/o. Mohammed Moin, 174, Kaleshwaran Nagar, Kattur ESI Quarters, Coimbatore.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

A. Chandrasekar S/o. Andamuthu Ravutthanan, H, VJ Complex, Manikkavasagar Colony, Solar, Erode-638002.

..Respondent(s)

M.Mohammed Asraf Ali

..Petitioner(s) Vs

A.Chandrasekar

..Respondent(s)

To condone the delay of 1486 days in filing the Criminal Revision against the judgment 16.12.2019 made in I Additional District and Sessions Judge of Erode and pass such other suitable orders and thus render justice.

¶17

For Petitioner(s): J.Ranjithkumar

¶18

Page1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRL MP No. 8065 of 2026

¶21

For Respondent(s): M/S.V.Logaswarna for L.Ramanathan

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 1486 days in filing the present Criminal Revision Case.

¶24

Mr. Ranjith Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

¶25

the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the entire cheque amount of Rs.9 lakhs has been paid to the respondent. This fact has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the Joint Compromise Affidavit filed along with the paper book. Thus, he submitted that this case may be finally decided by this court by exercising power under section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶26

Ms.B.Logaswarna, learned representing counsel for Mr.L.Ramanathan,

¶27

submits that the entire amount of Rs.9 lakhs has been paid to the respondent and no amount is due. He also submitted that in this regard, a Joint Compromise Affidavit had already been filed by the parties, which is already on record. Thus, she submitted that she has no objection if the delay in filing the present revision may be condoned.

¶28

Page2 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRL MP No. 8065 of 2026

¶31

SHAMIM AHMED J.

¶32

MSR

¶33