S.Vasanthi v. State rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory procedural order allowing an impleadment application (Crl.M.P.No.9338/2026) in pending Crl.R.C.No.1001 of 2026; proposed respondents 2, 3 and 4, the persons against whom the petitioner intends to file an FIR, impleaded as respondents; notice by RPAD/private mode; counter four weeks; rejoinder two weeks; final hearing 29.07.2026; Madras High Court; Shamim Ahmed, J.; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Impleadment application allowed; proposed respondents 2, 3 and 4 impleaded as respondents 2, 3 and 4 in Crl.R.C.No.1001 of 2026. Notice to respondents 2 to 4 to issue through court by RPAD, private mode of service also permitted; steps within one week; respondents to file counter within four weeks of service; two weeks thereafter for the petitioner's rejoinder; case to be put up for final hearing on 29.07.2026 before the appropriate Bench.