Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.Vinoth Vs The State rep.by — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2026
V.Vinoth Vs The State rep.byV.Vinoth v. The State rep.by

Allowed¶29

V.Vinoth v. The State rep.by

Madras HC19 Jun 2026CRL MP/10306/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Impleadment permitted in criminal revision — High Court of Judicature at Madras; CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026 AND CRL RC NO. 473 OF 2026; decided 19-06-2026 by Justice Shamim Ahmed. Petitioner V. Vinoth S/o. Venugopal (counsel M. Vijaya Ragavan) impleads Jeevitha W/o.Vinayagam as 2nd respondent in his revision against the order dated 24.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024 (Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur), arising from Cr.No.1410/2023 of Tiruttani police station (State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruttani Division; Govt. Advocate M. Dinesh). Order allowed; Registry to amend within one week; notice by RPAD/private service permitted; three weeks for counter affidavit, one week for rejoinder; posted 22.09.2026.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of Jeevitha as 2nd respondent in Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026 allowed; Office to amend the Revision Case within one week; notice to the newly impleaded respondent by RPAD (private service permitted); three weeks for counter affidavit, one week thereafter for rejoinder; matter posted to 22.09.2026 before the appropriate Bench.

Why is it important?

The impleadment petition is allowed on the averments in the supporting affidavit; the Office is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the Revision Case within one week. ¶29

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Impleadment of Jeevitha as 2nd respondent in Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026 allowed; Office to amend the Revision Case within one week; notice to the newly impleaded respondent by RPAD (private service permitted); three weeks for counter affidavit, one week thereafter for rejoinder; matter posted to 22.09.2026 before the appropriate Bench.

Issue for consideration

Whether proposed respondent no.2, Jeevitha, should be impleaded as 2nd respondent in Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026.

Court's answer

The impleadment petition is allowed on the averments in the supporting affidavit; the Office is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the Revision Case within one week.

Ratio / Principle

Notice is to be issued to the newly impleaded respondent No.2 by RPAD, steps to be taken within one week, with private mode of service permitted.

Key takeaways

Respondents are granted three weeks to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner one week thereafter to file a rejoinder; the case is to be put up on 22.09.2026 before the appropriate Bench.ratio¶36

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court, single Judge (Shamim Ahmed, J.), order dated 19-06-2026 in Crl.M.P.No.10306 of 2026, ancillary to Crl.RC No. 473 of 2026: the petition to implead Jeevitha W/o.Vinayagam as 2nd respondent in the criminal revision — which seeks to set aside the order dated 24.11.2025 of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024 (connected with Cr.No.1410/2023, Tiruttani police station) — was allowed on the averments in the supporting affidavit. The Registry was directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the Revision Case within one week; notice to the newly impleaded respondent to go by RPAD with private mode of service permitted; respondents allowed three weeks to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner one week thereafter for a rejoinder; matter posted to 22.09.2026 before the appropriate Bench.

A

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026 AND CRL RC NO. 473 OF 2026

V.Vinoth S/o. Venugopal, New No.166/1, Bajanai Kovil Street, Serukkanur Village and Post, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

The State rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruttani Division, Tiruttani police station, Tiruvallur district. Cr.No.1410/2023.

Jeevitha W/o.Vinayagam, Serukanur Colony and Village, Tiruttani taluk, Tiruvallur district.

..Respondent(s)

CRL RC No. 473 of 2026

V.Vinoth S/o. Venugopal, New No.166/1, Bajanai Kovil Street, Serukkanur Village and Post, Tiruttani Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

__________ Page1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026

State Rep.by, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruttani Division, Tiruttani Police Station, Tiruvallur District. Cr.No.1410/2023.

..Respondent(s)

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026

To implead the 2nd respondent/proposed respondent no.2 namely Jeevitha as 2nd respondent in the above Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026.

CRL RC No. 473 of 2026

To allow the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside the order 24.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur.

For Petitioner(s): M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Dinesh, For 1st Respondent Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to implead proposed Respondent No.2 namely Jeevitha as 2nd respondent in the above Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026.

Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the Office is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the Revision Case within a period of one week from today.

Issue notice to the newly impleaded respondent No.2 by RPAD. Steps to be

taken within a period of one week from today. Private mode of service is also permitted.

__________ Page2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026

Accordingly, respondents are granted three weeks time to file counter affidavit and one week thereafter is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file a rejoinder to the counter affidavit.

5.Put up this case on 22.09.2026 before the appropriate Bench.

19-06-2026

(1/2)

GV

To

The State rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruttani Division, Tiruttani police station, Tiruvallur district. Cr.No.1410/2023.

Jeevitha W/o.Vinayagam, Serukanur Colony and Village, Tiruttani taluk, Tiruvallur district

__________ Page3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026

SHAMIM AHMED J.

GV

CRL MP No. 10306 of 2026 AND CRL RC NO. 473 OF 2026

19-06-2026 (1/2)

__________ Page4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether proposed respondent no.2, Jeevitha, should be impleaded as 2nd respondent in Crl.RC.No.473 of 2026.¶23
The court held
The impleadment petition is allowed on the averments in the supporting affidavit; the Office is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the Revision Case within one week.ratio¶29

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 24.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024, sought to be set aside through the criminal revision¶25
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur · 24.11.2025
Prior proceeding
Crime registered as Cr.No.1410/2023, cited against the State respondent in both the impleadment petition and the revision¶10
Prior proceeding
Criminal Revision Petition CRL RC No. 473 of 2026 filed to set aside the order dated 24.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024¶25

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
V.Vinoth S/o. Venugopal¶7
M.Vijaya Ragavan
respondent
The State rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruttani Division, Tiruttani police station, Tiruvallur district¶10
Mr. M. Dinesh
respondent
Jeevitha W/o.Vinayagam¶11

Coram

AI extract

SHAMIM AHMEDauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 19 Jun 2026 · June
Registered: 18 Jun 2026
Case no.: CRL MP/10306/2026
CNR: HCMA011306602026
Bench: Shamim Ahmed
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: CRL MP

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Shamim Ahmed

Bala Abirami Vs The State rep.by
18 Jun 2026
B.Venkataramanan Vs State by Commissioner of Police
18 Jun 2026
Mani Vs State Through, The Inspector of Police
18 Jun 2026
S.Pradeep Vs S.Aishwarya
19 Jun 2026
P.G.Kannan Vs The State, Represented by The Inspector of Police
19 Jun 2026
Mathiyalagan Vs Swatha
19 Jun 2026

Cite this judgement

V.Vinoth v. The State rep.by, CRL MP/10306/2026 (MAD), decided on 19 June 2026.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

Order dated 24.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024, sought to be set aside through the criminal revisionPrincipal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur · 24.11.2025
Crime registered as Cr.No.1410/2023, cited against the State respondent in both the impleadment petition and the revision
Criminal Revision Petition CRL RC No. 473 of 2026 filed to set aside the order dated 24.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.6736 of 2024 in SC.No.44 of 2024

View full history

Bench / Coram

SHAMIM AHMED

Parties & counsel