Delay-condonation petition for a criminal revision case was allowed after the respondent's counsel raised no objection and sufficient reasons were stated in the affidavit; the Registry was directed to number the main revision case and list it for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL MP No.9926 of 2026 and
CRL RC SR No. 34463 of 2026
SHAMIM AHMED, J.
This petition has been filed to condone a delay of 30 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.SR.No.23429 of 2026.
2.Mr. M. Dinesh, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), appearing for the respondent, submits that he has no objection to this petition to condone the delay being allowed.
3.Considering the fact that sufficient reasons have been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition on hand, and the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, the delay of 8 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.SR.No. 23429 of 2026 is condoned.
4.Thus, the petition is ordered .
5.Registry is directed to number the main case if it is otherwise in order and post it on 22.07.2026 under the caption “For Admission”.
18.06.2026
SHA
__________ Page1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 30-day delay in filing the Criminal Revision Case should be condoned.
Petitioner in Crl.MP.No.9926 of 2026
Respondent represented by M. Dinesh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
