Disposed¶22

C. Mathivanan, v. Natarajan

Contempt Petition – Compliance confirmed

Madras HC15 Jul 2026CONT P(MD)/669/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition; Section 11, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; willful disobedience of order dated 22.09.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.25181 of 2025; compliance confirmed by counsel on both sides; second respondent discharged from contempt proceedings; contempt petition closed; Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., Tirunelveli; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J.; 15.07.2026.

What did the court decide?

With compliance of the order dated 22.09.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.25181 of 2025 confirmed by counsel on both sides, the Court discharged the second respondent from the contempt proceedings and closed the contempt petition. ¶22

C. Mathivanan, Vs Natarajan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD) No.669 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.07.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶6

Cont.P.(MD) No.669 of 2026

¶7

C.Mathivanan ... Petitioner -vs1.Natarajan Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., 23/2, Thoothukudi Road Kattabomman Nagar Tirunelveli District-627 007 2.Balasubramanian General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TVL) Ltd., Tirunelveli Region Tirunelveli District-627 007 ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the contemnors / respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.25181 of 2025, dated 22.09.2025.

¶9

Page 1 of 4

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Cont.P.(MD) No.669 of 2026

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro Standing Counsel

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining willful disobedience of the order dated 22.09.2025, in W.P.(MD) No.25181 of 2025, passed by this Court.

¶15

2. Pursuant to the order dated 15.06.2026 passed by this Court, the second respondent appeared in person before this Court today.

¶16

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the order dated 22.09.2025, in W.P.(MD) No.25181 of 2025, passed by this Court, has been complied with.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also confirms that the order passed by this Court in the main writ petition has been complied with.

¶18

Page 2 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Cont.P.(MD) No.669 of 2026

¶21

5. In the light of the same, the second respondent is discharged

¶22

from the contempt proceedings and this contempt petition is closed.