Nirmala v. Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a writ order. Both counsel represented the underlying order had been duly complied with; the court recorded this and closed the contempt petition.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.1609 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.07.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Contempt Petition No.1609 of 2026
- Nirmala 2. Karthiga ...Petitioners
Vs
Selvaraj, Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur, ...Respondent Salem District.
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for Contempt of Court under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 09.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.47722 of 2025.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Nalliyappan
For Respondent : Ms.A.Suganya Government Counsel
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nirmala
- petitioner
Karthiga
- respondent
Selvaraj, Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur, Salem District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court