Puraviyammal v. Mani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench allowed two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed to declare the 10th petitioner as a major and to discharge the 8th petitioner from guardian duties. The court found the supporting affidavit sufficient and allowed both petitions.
What did the court decide?
Both Civil Miscellaneous Petitions were allowed; registry directed to carry out necessary amendments in the bundle.
What the court decided
C.M.P(MD)Nos.8153 and 8152 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.07.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
C.M.P(MD)Nos.8153 and 8152 of 2026 in
A.S(MD)SR.No.82083 of 2023
- 1.Puraviyammal, W/o. Vellakkannu Gounder, Ramagoundanpatti, Viralur Post, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
- Palaniyandi, S/o. Vellakkanu Gounder, Ramagoundanpatti, Viralur Post, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
Nagaraj (Died)
Anjamani (Died)
- Chinnammal, D/o. Vellakkannu Gounder, Ramagoundanpatti, Viralur Post, Illuppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the 10th petitioner must be declared a major.
Whether the 8th petitioner should be discharged as guardian of the 10th petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Puraviyammal
- petitioner
Palaniyandi
- petitioner
Chinnammal
- petitioner
Pichaikkannu
- petitioner
Raja
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court