Allowed¶37

The Divisional Manager v. Pandiyammal

Madras HC25 Feb 2026CMP(MD)/17815/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Insurance Company Ltd. (petitioners) v. Pandiyammal, Manikandan & another (respondents); CMP(MD) No.17815 of 2025 in CMA(MD) SR No.92398 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; P.Vadamalai J.; decided 25-02-2026; condonation of 64-day delay in filing civil miscellaneous appeal allowed; appeal to be numbered and listed for admission on 27.02.2026; third respondent (XXXX) earlier deleted by order dated 23.02.2026; advocates: A.S.Mathialagan (petitioners), P.Rajalingam (R1 & R2).

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 64-day delay in filing C.M.A.(MD)SR No.92398 of 2025 granted; Registry directed to number the appeal, if otherwise in order, and list it under the caption 'For Admission' on 27.02.2026. ¶37

The Divisional Manager Vs Pandiyammal — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶6

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025

¶7

¶8

CMA(MD) SR NO. 92398 of 2025

¶9

1.The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, No. 5-A, Sub Collector Office Road, Opp. Dindigul Court, YMR Patty, Dindigul - 624 001.

¶10

2.Branch Office, National Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Manager, Divisional Office-I, No.4, K.R.T.Building, Premenade Road, Cantonment, Trichy - 1.

¶11

Petitioner(s) Vs

¶12

1.Pandiyammal 2.Manikandan

3.XXXX

Respondent(s)

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

(Memo

¶18

(Memo dated 19.02.2026 in U.S.R.No. 7252 is recorded and to that effect, R3 deleted vide court order dated 23.02.2026 made in CMP(MD) No.17815 of 2025 in CMA(MD)SR No.92398 of 2025 by PVMJ)

¶19

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025

¶20

For Petitioner(s):

¶21

Mr.A.S.Mathialagan, Advocate

¶22

For Respondent(s):

¶23

Mr.P.Rajalingam, Advocate for R1 & R2

¶24

R3 – Deleted

¶25

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 64 days in filing this appeal and order to take the appeal on the file.

¶26

ORDER

¶27

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the

¶28

delay of 64 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A. (MD)SR No.92398 of 2025 before this Court.

¶29

2/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025

¶32

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused

¶33

the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶34

The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 has raised only

¶35

formal objection to this petition.

¶36

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this Civil

¶37

Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶38

25-02-2026

¶39

Note : The Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.(MD)SR No.92398 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same under the caption “For Admission” on 27.02.2026 .

¶40

mkn

¶41

3/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025

¶44

P.VADAMALAI, J.

¶45

mkn

¶46

CMP(MD) NO. 17815 of 2025 IN CMA(MD) SR NO. 92398 of 2025

¶47

25.02.2026

¶48

4/4

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Divisional Manager v. Pandiyammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Divisional Manager v. Pandiyammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs Ajith Kumar

Dr.Ebanesh Bensam Vs Rotary Club of Tamiraparani

M/s.Sbi General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Kumar

R.Venkatesan, Vs Suseela

Annai Theresa Vs Arockiasamy

R.Venkatesan, Vs Suseela