Allowed¶39

Ganesan v. Soodamani

Madras HC9 Apr 2026CMP(MD)/17151/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; CMP(MD) No. 17151 of 2025 in AS(MD) No. 259 of 2023; Judge P. Vadamalai; decided 09-04-2026; Order 22 Rule 4 CPC; impleading/joinder of legal representative of deceased respondent; second respondent Kannan died; K.Anjalaidevi added and ranked as third respondent; petitioners Ganesan, Periyanayagi, Amutha, Rajalakshmi, Jeyalakshmi; counsel G. Mathavan for petitioners, B. Sekar for R1 Soodamani; petition allowed without objection; Registry directed to amend appeal memorandum.

What did the court decide?

The proposed respondent (K.Anjalaidevi) is brought on record as the legal representative of the deceased second respondent (Kannan) and ranked as respondent No.3 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.259 of 2023; the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal memorandum. ¶39

Ganesan Vs Soodamani — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 17151 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶6

CMP(MD) NO. 17151 of 2025

¶7

¶8

AS(MD) NO. 259 of 2023

1.Ganesan

2.Periyanayagi

3.Amutha

4.Rajalakshmi

5.Jeyalakshmi

Petitioner(s) Vs

1.Soodamani

2.Kannan (Died)

3.K.Anjalaidevi

Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s):

¶20

Mr.G.Mathavan, Advocate

¶21

For Respondent(s):

¶22

Mr.B.Sekar, Advocate for R1

¶23

1/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

CMP(MD) NO. 17151 of 2025

¶26

R2 – Died

¶27

R3 – No Appearance

¶28

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC to bring on record Respondent No.3 / Proposed Respondent herein as the legal representative of the deceased 2^nd Respondent (Kannan) and rank her as respondent No.3 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.259 of 2023.

¶29

ORDER

¶30

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to bring on record the proposed 3^rd respondent herein as the legal representative of the deceased 2^nd respondent and rank her as the 3^rd respondent in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.259 of 2023 on the file of this Court.

¶31