Disposed¶32

P.Mahalingam v. Vetrivendhan (Died)

Madras HC9 Apr 2026AS(MD)/183/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A.S(MD)No.183 of 2017, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 09.04.2026 by Justice P.Vadamalai; appeal under Section 96 CPC against judgment and decree dated 30.06.2017 in O.S.No.50 of 2009 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni at Periyakulam; disposed of on joint compromise: Joint Compromise Memo with sale deed dated 20.02.2026 recorded and made part of the decree; no costs; C.M.P(MD)No.10524 of 2017 closed; respondents 2 to 4 (Valarmathi, V.Kamesh Kumar, V.Rajiv) substituted as LRs of deceased respondent Vetrivendhan by order dated 29.03.2022; parties from Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

What did the court decide?

Appeal Suit disposed of on the basis of the Joint Compromise Memo, which was recorded and shall form part of the decree; no costs; connected C.M.P(MD)No.10524 of 2017 closed.

P.Mahalingam Vs Vetrivendhan (Died) — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.S(MD)No.183 of 2017

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 09.04.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶6

A.S(MD)No.183 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD)No.10524 of 2017

¶7

P.Mahalingam,

¶8

S/o.Palanisamy Gowder, Door No.1B,Ward No.15, Krishnasamy Gowder Street, Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District - 625 518.

¶9

... Appellant/Plaintiff

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.Vetrivendhan (Died), S/o.Periya Krishnasamy Gowder, 11^th Ward, Edayar Street, Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District - 625 518.

¶12

... 1^st Respondent/Defendant

¶13

Valarmathi, W/o.Late. Vetrivendhan, 11^th Ward, Edayar Street, Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District - 625 518.

¶14

3.V.Kamesh Kumar, S/o.Late.Vetrivendhan, 11^th Ward, Edayar Street, Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District - 625 518.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

A.S(MD)No.183 of 2017

¶18

4.V.Rajiv,

¶19

S/o.Late. Vetrivendhan,

¶20

11^th Ward, Edayar Street, Melagudalur Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District - 625 518.

¶21

... Respondent Nos.2 to 4

¶22

(Respondents 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide Court order dated 29.03.2022 made in CMP(MD)Nos.4564 to 4567 of 2021 in A.S(MD)Nos. 182 and 183 of 2017)

¶23

PRAYER :- This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 30.06.2017 made in O.S.No.50 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni at Periyakulam, by allowing this appeal.

¶24

For Appellant : Mrs.P.Jesi Jeeva Priya R1 : Died For R2 to R4 : Mr.D.Kirubakaran

¶25

JUDGMENT

¶26

This Appeal Suit is filed to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 30.06.2017 made in O.S.No.50 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni at Periyakulam.

¶27

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today (09.04.2026), both sides learned counsel submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

A.S(MD)No.183 of 2017

¶31

a Joint Compromise Memo has also been filed along with a copy of sale deed, dated 20.02.2026. The appellant as well as the respondents 2 to 4 are present before this Court and they are identified by their respective counsel. The identity proof of the parties is also verified. The contents of the Joint Compromise Memo were read over and explained to both parties in the presence of their counsel and both parties submitted that the same were correct. Accordingly, the said Joint Compromise Memo is recorded.

¶32

3. In view of the above, this Appeal Suit is disposed of. The Joint

¶33

Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

09.04.2026

VSD