Allowed

The Chief Educational Officer v. S Arockia Samy

Madras HC9 Feb 2026CMP(MD)/11250/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Government education officials sought condonation of a 584-day delay in filing a writ appeal, explaining that case records were misplaced among other files. The court condoned the delay subject to payment of Rs.10,000 as costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee within fifteen days, failing which the petition would stand dismissed automatically.

What the court decided

AI extract

The Chief Educational Officer Vs S Arockia Samy — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.02.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025 in

¶7

W.A.(MD) SR No.57020 of 2025

¶8

1.The Chief Educational Officer Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District

¶9

2.The Director Educational Officer

¶10

(Secondary) Tirunelveli District ... Petitioners -vs-

¶11

1.S.Arockia Samy

¶12

2.The Correspondent St.Xavier's Higher Secondary School Palayamkottai-627 002 Tirunelveli District ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay

¶14

of 584 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 03.11.2023, passed in W.P.(MD) No.16724 of 2023.

¶15

_____________ Page 1 of 5_

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Ms.A.Amala for R1 No appearance for R2

¶19

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

¶20

This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 584 days in the filing the above writ appeal.

¶21

2. It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners that in some cases arising out of of the same common order, appeals preferred and the same were dismissed and in some cases, appeals are pending and interim stay has been granted.

¶22

3. A perusal of the affidavit, more particularly, Paragraph No.14 of the affidavit, shows that the case records got mixed up with the other case records and therefore, case records of the case on hand could not be traced out and therefore, the appeal could not be preferred within the time limit. This Court is inclined to condone the delay, however upon certain terms, for the recklessness of the officials concerned.

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025

¶26

4. Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 584 days in filing the above writ appeal is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) payable by the petitioners to the High Court Legal Services Committee, attached to the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Failing which, this civil miscellaneous petition will stand dismissed automatically without further reference to this Court.

¶27

5. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the cost is paid within the time limit as prescribed above and if papers are otherwise in order, and post the same for admission in the usual course.

¶28

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 09.02.2026

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶30

Note to Office:

¶31

Mark a copy of this order to the Officer In-charge, High Court Legal Services Committee, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

krk

¶33

_____________ Page 3 of 5_

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025

¶36

To:

¶37

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

¶38

2.The Director Educational Officer,

¶39

(Secondary),

¶40

Tirunelveli District.

¶41

Page 4 of 5

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025

¶44

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

¶45

krk

¶46

C.M.P.(MD) No.11250 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR No.57020 of 2025

¶47

09.02.2026

¶48

_____________ Page 5 of 5_

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Chief Educational Officer v. S Arockia Samy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

The Chief Educational Officer v. S Arockia Samy

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Badrinarayanan Vs T.BharathiDevarajulu

N.Kumar Vs The District Collector

M.Alagarsamy Vs The Commissioner

S. Karpagam Vs The Tamil Nadu State Information Commission

The Chief Engineer Vs S.Muthukumar

Velliah Vs The Tahsildar