Lakshmi v. Raman
Case brief
What is this about?
Stay petition closed — Madras High Court, R. Sakthivel J., 11-06-2026; CMP No.8478 of 2003 in S.A. No.935 of 2003; Section 151 CPC 1908; interim stay granted 26.03.2003 for three weeks, not extended; closure for long pendency of Second Appeal; decree dated October 23, 2000 in O.S. No.888 of 1993 (Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai) confirmed in A.S. No.134 of 2000 and 30 of 2001 (December 10, 2002) by Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai; parties: Lakshmi, Govindaraj, Balan, Seenu, Malliga, Maheswari v. Raman, Muthu Gounder, Govindasamy, Kamakshi @ Poongavnammal, Shankar, Kumar, Asaithambi and Government of Tamil Nadu (Collector, Tiruvannamalai); advocates: R. Rajmohan/V. Suthakar for appellants, R. Karthikeyan for Respondents 1 & 2.
What did the court decide?
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the long pendency of the Second Appeal, the Court held that no useful purpose would be served by keeping CMP No.8478 of 2003 in S.A. No.935 of 2003 pending, and the Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.