Dismissed¶50

Kesavan v. Dhanapal Naicker

Madras HC10 Jun 2026SA/569/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal SA No. 569 of 2002, Madras High Court, decided 10-06-2026 by R. Sakthivel J., dismissed for default. Filed under Section 100 CPC against the judgement and decree dated 25.04.2001 in A.S.No.43 of 1999 (Sub Court, Madurantakam) confirming the judgement and decree dated 17.12.1997 in O.S.No.222 of 1993 (District Munsif Court, Madurantakam). Appellants Kesavan, Krishnan and Andhiri absent on 10.06.2026 despite being shown in the Cause List following a no-instructions memo by counsel on record for Appellants 1 & 2; no order as to costs; no issues framed and no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

None to the appellants; the Second Appeal was dismissed for default and there shall be no order as to costs. ¶50

Kesavan Vs Dhanapal Naicker — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA No. 569 of 2002

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶6

SA No. 569 of 2002

¶7

Kesavan

¶8

S/o Munuswamy Naicker 118, B Block, Housing Board, Nattan Thottam, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶9

Krishnan, S/o Munuswamy Naicker 118, B Block, Housing Board, Nattan Thottam, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

¶10

Andhiri S/o Munuswamy Naicker, Neikuppy Village, Madurantakam Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶11

..Appellants/ Appellants/ Plaintiffs

¶12

¶13

Dhanapal Naicker S/o Narayanaswamy Naicker

¶14

Govindasamy Naicker S/o Chinnasamy Naicker

¶15

Varadhan S/o Chinnasamy Naicker

¶16

Devan S/o Chinnasamy Naicker

¶17

__________ Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

SA No. 569 of 2002

¶20

Rajeswari Ammal W/o Vajiravel Naicer

¶21

Gajendran, S/o Vajiravel Naicer

¶22

Panjali D/o Vajiravel Naicer

¶23

Minor Pushpa D/o Vajiravel Naicer

¶24

Minor Anjalai D/o Vajiravel Naicer

¶25

(8&9) Rep. by their Mother and Guardian Rajeswari Ammal) ( 1 to 9 residing at Neikuppy Village, Kallapiranpuram Post, Madurantakam Taluk)

¶26

10.Chandra W/o Balasundaram

¶27

11.Sekar S/o Balasundaram ( 10 & 11 residing at Kottur No.31C, Guruvappa Naicker Street, Madras -86)

¶28

..Respondents/ Respondents/ Defendants.

¶29

Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the judgement and decree dated 25.04.2001 made in A.S.No.43 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court Madurantakam confirming the judgement and decree dated 17.12.1997 made in O.S.No.222 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantakam.

¶30

For Appellants: No appearance For Respondents: No appearance

¶31

Page2 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

SA No. 569 of 2002

¶34

Judgment

¶35

When the matter was listed before this Court on 05.06.2026, this Court

¶36

passed the following order:

¶37

“Mr.N.K.Sivakumar representing Mr.M.S.Subramanian, Counsel on record for the Appellants 1 & 2 is before this Court and submits that the Counsel on record has already filed a Memo dated 02.06.20265 stating that he has no instructions from the Appellants 1 & 2.

¶38

2.In view of the above submission made by the Counsel representing the Appellants 1 & 2, this Court directs the Registry to print the name of the Appellants 1 & 2 in the cause list on 10.06.2026 and list this Second Appeal on 10.06.2026.”

¶39