Allowed

C.Subramani v. C.Pasuvaraj

Madras HC17 Jun 2026CMP/30630/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought condonation of a 199-day delay in filing an appeal suit, citing the pendency of a civil revision petition as the cause. The court accepted the explanation and allowed the petition, subject to the payment of a fixed cost.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 199 days condoned on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, on or before 30.06.2026.

C.Subramani Vs C.Pasuvaraj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

C.M.P.No.30630 of 2025 in A.S.SR.No.188572 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-06-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI CMP NO.30630 of 2025 in AS SR NO.188572 OF 2025

¶5

C.Subramani .. Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

C.Pasuvaraj ..Respondent

¶8

Prayer : This petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 199 days in filing this Appeal Suit.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kaviveerappan For Respondent : No Appearance

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of

¶12

199 days in filing the above appeal.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

Notice to the sole respondent has been served and returned with the

¶15

endorsement “refused”. Hence, service is deemed sufficient. Despite such service, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.M.P.No.30630 of 2025 in A.S.SR.No.188572 of 2025

¶19

The petitioner would aver that, instead of preferring the present Appeal Suit, he had filed a Civil Revision Petition challenging the order passed in I.A.No.2 of 2024 before this Court and that the same was disposed of by order dated 23.10.2025. According to the petitioner, the delay of 199 days in filing the present Appeal Suit occurred on account of the pendency of the said Civil Revision Petition.

¶20

Accepting the averments made in the petition, this petition shall stand allowed on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable in favour of the Cancer Institute (WIA), Gandhi Nagar Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai – 20 (payable in S.B.A/c.No.149710011000002, Union Bank of India, Madhya Kailash Branch, Cancer Institute (WIA) Campus, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai-36, Branch Name and Code : 1497, MICR No.600011049, IFSC Code : UBIN0814971), on or before 30.06.2026 . Failing which, this petition shall stand automatically dismissed without any further reference to this Court.

¶21

17.06.2026

¶22

nvi To

¶23

1.The Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri.

¶24

The Cancer Institute (WIA), Gandhi Nagar Canal Bank Road, Adyar, Chennai – 20.

¶25

CMP NO.30630 of 2025 in AS SR NO.188572 OF 2025

¶26

Page 2 of 2

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Subramani v. C.Pasuvaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Subramani v. C.Pasuvaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajasigamani Vs Sakunthala

Mr.R.Karthikeyan Vs Mrs.R.Sarojini

Thangammal Vs Subramani

T.S Ramanan Vs K.Chandrasekar

M.Shanmugasundaram Vs a.Ramasami

Premavathy Vs Sivagamy