Rajasigamani v. Sakunthala
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-prosecution dismissal, Madras High Court, A.S.No.670 of 2019 (connected C.M.P.No.20104 of 2019), decided 16.06.2026 by R. Kalaimathi, J. Appellants Rajasigamani, R.Rajachakravarthy, R.Selvarasu and Mahalakshmi v. Respondents Sagunthala, Panchatcharam, Sivanandam, Palanivel, Ramesh, Rukumani and Kuppusamy. Appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. r/w Order 41 & 41-A of C.P.C. against Fair and Decreetal Order dated 22.11.2018 in O.S.No.202/2012, First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. Counsel absent on 04.06.2026 and 16.06.2026; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, no costs; no findings on merits.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution as none represented the appellants; no costs awarded; the connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No.20104 of 2019) is closed. ¶28