Dismissed¶45
Ragavaperumal v. Panchanathan
Madras HCCMP/12359/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madras High Court single-judge order dismissing as not pressed a CMP under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC that sought to bring on record two proposed respondents (V.Lakshmi and A.Burma) as legal representatives of the deceased 5th respondent (Poorasamy) in Second Appeal S.A. No. 780 of 2001; dismissal based solely on counsel's endorsement of withdrawal; no decision on merits of LR substitution; petitioner Raghava Perumal represented by Ms.Anvitha for Mrs.V.Srimathi.
What did the court decide?
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner stating that the petition was not being pressed, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. ¶45