Allowed¶25

Mukand Sumi Special Steel Limited v. Sanco Trans Limited

Madras HC18 Mar 2026A/1411/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interlocutory order, High Court of Judicature at Madras, dated 18-03-2026: A No. 1411 of 2026 in C.S(COMM DIV) No. 56 of 2021, Mukand Sumi Special Steel Limited (applicant/plaintiff) v. Sanco Trans Limited (D1) and Sankar Transport (D2). Leave granted under Order XIV Rule 8 O.S.Rules / Order VIII Rule 9 CPC to file reply to D1's additional written statement; application allowed; Registry directed to receive reply statement; Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to the Applicant/Plaintiff to file a Reply Statement to the Additional Written Statement of the 1st Respondent/1st Defendant; Registry directed to receive the reply statement. ¶25

Mukand Sumi Special Steel Limited Vs Sanco Trans Limited — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A No. 1411 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

A No. 1411 of 2026 IN

¶7

C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 56 OF 2021

¶8

Mukand Sumi Special Steel Limited REPRESENTED BY IS CHIEF OF PROJECTS AND OPERATIONS,

¶9

MR.OMPRAVAL SINGH, Mukand Kalwe Works, Thane-Belapur Road, Dighe, Kalwe, Thane - 400 605, Maharashtra

¶10

..Applicant(s)

¶11

¶12

Sanco Trans Limited Represented By Its Managing Director, S.T.Tower, New No.24 And 25, Second Line Beach Road, Chennai 600 001.

¶13

Sankar Transport represented by its Sole Proprietorship No.40, MasthanKoil Street, Ennore Express Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai - 600 019.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

PRAYER : Judge’s summons filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the O.S.Rules read with Under Order VIII Rule 9 of C.P.C. praying to grant leave to the Applicant/Plaintiff to file Reply Statement to the Additional Written Statement of the 1st Respondent/1st Defendant in the present suit.

¶16

For Applicant(s): Mr.R.Venkat Raman for M/s.Tatva Legal Chennai For Respondent(s): Mr.Bijai Sunder for D1

¶17

Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

A No. 1411 of 2026

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The plaintiff has applied for leave to file a reply to the additional written

¶22

statement of the first defendant. In the affidavit in support of the application, it is stated that false statements have been made in the additional written statement.

¶23