Allowed¶23

M/s Mahaveera v. Varkha Surendra Kumar Varyani alias Geetha and another

Madras HC12 Jan 2026A/133/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court Commercial Division order dated 12.01.2026 (Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.): leave-to-sue application A.No.133 of 2026 in proposed specific performance suit regarding lease of immovable property allowed; Court held cause of action arose within its jurisdiction; applicant M/s Mahaveera (partnership firm) granted leave to sue respondents Varkha Surendra Kumar Varyani alias Geetha and Neha Kishore Bakthani alias Asha; Registry directed to number the suit.

What did the court decide?

Leave to sue the respondents before this Court granted to the applicant; Registry directed to number the suit, if otherwise in order. ¶23

M/s Mahaveera Vs Varkha Surendra Kumar Varyani alias Geetha and another — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A. No.133 of 2026 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) Sr. No.206633 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 12.01.2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

A. No.133 of 2026 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) Sr. No.206633 of 2025

¶6

M/s Mahaveera, Partnership firm Registered under the Indian Partnership Act 1932, Mr.N.Jitendra Kumar No.92 Pondy Bazaar,T. Nagar, Chennai 600017, Tamil Nadu, India

¶7

.. Applicant

¶8

¶9

1.Varkha Surendra Kumar Varyani alias Geetha D/o.Late Mohandas Tejumal, Flat No.4 3rd Floor, Gokul Apartments, Door No.314 Llyods Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

¶10

2.Neha Kishore Bakthani alias Asha

¶11

D/o.Late Mohandas Tejumal Flat No.4, 3^rd Floor Gokul Apartments, Door No.314 Llyods Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600014

¶12

Also at: 3, Wellington Terrace, Kingston-6, Jamaica

¶13

.. Respondents

¶14

For Applicant : Ms.Vinithra Srinivasan

¶15

1/2

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

A. No.133 of 2026 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) Sr. No.206633 of 2025

¶18

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

¶19

mmi

¶20

ORDER

¶21

In a proposed suit for specific performance in relation to the lease of immovable asset, the intending plaintiff seeks leave to sue.

¶22

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the immovable property concerned is situated at T.Nagar, Chennai and that the applicant is currently in possession of the property and has sought the relief of restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.

¶23

Upon examining the draft plaint and the documents annexed thereto, it appears that the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, this application is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondents before this Court. As a corollary, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if otherwise in order.

¶24

12.01.2026

¶25

mmi

¶26

A.No.133 of 2026 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) Sr. No.206633 of 2025

¶27

2/2

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis