Dismissed¶32

M/s.Poornika Rice Mill v. The Chief Judicial Magistrate

Madras HC21 Apr 2025WP(MD)/9400/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Poornika Rice Mill v. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and Canara Bank, Alangulam Branch; W.P.(MD)No.9400 of 2025; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; writ of certiorarified mandamus; quashing of order in Crl.M.P.No.182 of 2025 dated 12.03.2025; loan account restructuring (Account No.184002935870); conditional interim order dated 03.04.2025 requiring 30% payment; non-compliance; dismissal with no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; decided 21.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioners had not complied with the conditional order dated 03.04.2025 (payment of 30% of the total amount to the Bank), the Court was not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition and dismissed it with no costs. ¶32

M/s.Poornika Rice Mill Vs The Chief Judicial… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9400 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶8

W.P.(MD)No.9400 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.7028 & 7031 of 2025

¶9

1.M/s.Poornika Rice Mill,

¶10

Rep. by its Proprietor, A.Krishnamoorthi

2.A.Krishnamoorthi

... Petitioners

-Vs-

1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi.

¶15

2.Canara Bank, Alangulam Branch, Through its Authorized Officer, D/N365A, S381/5, Tenkasi Road, Alangulam, Tenkasi-627 851.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.182 of 2025, dated 12.03.2025 on the file of the 1^st

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD) No.9400 of 2025

¶21

respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the 2^nd respondent to restructure the petitioner's loan Account No.184002935870.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajeshkumar For R1 : Court For R2 : Mr.V.Balasubramanian, Standing Counsel

¶23

ORDER

¶24

[Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J. ]

¶25

Challenging the order of the 1^st respondent dated 12.03.2025, the

¶26

petitioner has filed this Writ Petition with a consequential direction to the 2^nd respondent to restructure his loan Account No.184002935870.

¶27

2.On 03.04.2025, this Court has passed a conditional order, directing the petitioners to pay 30% of the total amount to the respondent Bank on or before 21.04.2025 and posted the matter today (21.04.2025) for reporting compliance.

¶28

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the 2^nd respondent would submit that the petitioners have not complied with the conditional order of this Court dated 03.04.2025.

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.9400 of 2025

¶32

4.In view of the said submission, we are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶33

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶34

[J.N.B., J.] & [S.S.Y., J.] 21.04.2025 (2/2)