The Director v. Nirmala M
Case brief
What is this about?
The court condoned a delay of 296 days in filing the Writ Appeal on payment of costs, finding the reasons sufficient and noting the respondent had no objection.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 296 days condoned on payment of Rs. 1,000/- to E-Seva Kendra Porta Cabins.
What the court decided
C.M.P.(MD)No.4423 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Five
PRESENT
The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
C.M.P.(MD)No.4423 of 2025 in W.A(MD)SR.No.19101 of 2025
1 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, CHENNAI 6.
2 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE CEO, THALAKULAM, MADURAI
3 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, AYYANPAPPAKUDI, AVANIYAPURAM, MADURAI 12
... PETITIONERS
Vs
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 296 days in filing the Writ Appeal should be condoned?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Director Directorate of School Education, Chennai
- petitioner
The Chief Educational Officer Office of the CEO, Thalakulam, Madurai
- petitioner
The District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District
- petitioner
The Head Master Government High School, Ayyanpappakudi, Avaniyapuram, Madurai
- respondent
Nirmala M
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court