Veluchamy Reddiar v. The District Collector
Mandamus – survey and fixing of boundary stones / individual patta
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), W.P.(MD)No.9357 of 2025, Veluchamy Reddiar v. The District Collector, Dindigul District and others (District Revenue Officer; RDO Palani; Tahsildar Vedasandur; Revenue Inspector Ayyaloor; VAO Paganatham), decided 21.04.2025 by Justice P.B. Balaji. Keywords: Article 226 mandamus; survey; fixing boundary stones; individual/separate patta; joint patta Nos.1491, 3818, 3819, 3820; Document No.815/1974 dated 16.04.1974; S.No.620/1; S.Nos.620/1F, 620/1H, 620/1I, 620/1K, 620/1L, 620/1N, 620/1O, 620/1P, 620/2A, 620/2B; 4 Acres 42.5 cents out of 8.85 Acres; application dated 19.03.2025 (online Nos. 2025/0123/13/010650, 2025/0105/13470823); earlier order dated 04.02.2025; connected W.P.(MD)No.3175 of 2025 (P.Velmurugan); twelve-week timeline; title dispute referred to civil court; petitioner aged about 84 years; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions: (i) survey to be conducted in the presence of the petitioner (Veluchamy Reddiar) and the writ petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.3175 of 2025 (P.Velmurugan); (ii) the fourth respondent (Tahsildar) to refrain from surveying any survey number where a title dispute is found, with parties left to approach the competent civil court; (iii) surveys and applications to be conducted and disposed of within twelve weeks where there is no overlap; (iv) the timeline earlier fixed in W.P.(MD)No.3175 of 2025 extended by a further twelve weeks; no order as to costs.