Disposed¶25

C.Selvam v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC24 Mar 2025WP(MD)/7100/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

escort for leave; Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982; Article 226; writ of mandamus; Commissioner of Police Tiruchirappalli/Trichy; nothing survives for adjudication; writ petition closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; W.P(MD); C.Selvam; N.Pragalathan; A.Thiruvdi Kumar Addl.Public Prosecutor; 24.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the proceedings passed by the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli dated 22.03.2025, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ petition. ¶24

C.Selvam Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED : 24 .03.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶5

W.P(MD)No.7100 of 2025

C.Selvam

... Petitioner

.Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

2.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Myalpore, Chennai-4.

¶11

3.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy.

¶12

4.The Additional Director General of Police/ The Additional Director General of Prison, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith provide the escort for enabling the Petitioner to avail the leave granted by the uthorities under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules,1982 in accordance with law.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For R1 to R5 : Mr.A.Thiruvdi Kumar Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J AND R.POORNIMA.,J

¶20

This Writ Petition is filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith provide the escort for enabling the Petitioner to avail the leave granted by the uthorities under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules,1982 in accordance with law.

¶21

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side andperused the mateials placed before this Court.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

3.In view of the proceedings passed by the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli vide order, dated 22.03.2025, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Wri petition.

¶25

4.Hence the Writ Petition stands closed.

¶26

[G.J.,J.] [R.P.,J.] 24.03.2025

¶27

NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶28

vsn

¶29

¶30