Disposed¶33

Ephram K v. The Commissioner of School Education

Madras HC21 Nov 2025WP(MD)/6649/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

K.Ephram v. Commissioner of School Education & others, W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022 (Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Abdul Quddhose J., 21.11.2025): mandamus under Article 226 for deployment/redeployment of surplus Physical Director Grade-II post from Arulmigu Senthilandavar Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Tiruchendur to needy schools; direction to Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi to decide representation dated 23.03.2022 on merits within twelve weeks; no opinion on merits; disposed of, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent (Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs awarded. ¶33

Ephram K Vs The Commissioner of School Education — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the respondents to deploy the surplus Physical Director Grade-II, along with the post, from Arulmigu Senthilandavar Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Tiruchendur to other needy schools, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 within a time stipulated by the Court.

¶21

Court's answer

No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if they are directed to consider the petitioner's representation on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by the Court; this formed the basis for granting the limited mandamus without adjudicating the merits.

¶27

Ratio / Principle

The Court expressly did not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation, leaving consideration of the merits to the respondents.

¶28

Key takeaways

The Court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 seeking the relief as sought for in the writ petition.ratio¶29
Final orders on the representation were to be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.ratio¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition (Madurai Bench, Madras High Court) disposed of under Article 226. The petitioner sought a mandamus to deploy the surplus Physical Director Grade-II, along with the post, from Arulmigu Senthilandavar Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Tiruchendur, to other needy schools, by considering his representation dated 23.03.2022. It was an admitted fact that the respondents had not considered the pre-writ representation; a counter affidavit had been filed by the third respondent. Holding that no prejudice would be caused, and expressly recording no opinion on the merits, the Court directed the third respondent (Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi) to consider the representation dated 23.03.2022 and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from receipt of a copy of the order. Writ petition disposed of; no costs.

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022

K.Ephram

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Commissioner of School Education Directorate of School Education DPI Complex, College Road Chennai-600 006

¶11

2.The Joint Director or School Education (Higher Secondary Education) Directorate of School Education College Road, Chennai-600 006

¶12

3.The Chief Educational Officer O/o.The Chief Educational Officer Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue

¶14

a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to deploy the surplus Physical Director Grade-II along with the post from Arulmigu Senthilandavar

¶15

Page 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022

¶18

Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Tiruchendur, to some other needy schools, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Louis For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to deploy the surplus Physical Director Grade-II along with the post from Arulmigu Senthilandavar Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Tiruchendur, to some other needy schools, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 within the time to be stipulated by this Court.

¶22

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the third respondent denying the contentions of the petitioner as raised in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition.

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022

¶26

3. However, it is an admitted fact that the representation given by the petitioner to the respondents prior to the filing of this writ petition seeking for the relief as sought for in this writ petition was not considered by the respondents.

¶27

4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶28

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation, as it is for the respondents to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.

¶29

6. Accordingly, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2022 seeking the relief as sought for in this writ petition and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

Page 3 of 5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD) No.6649 of 2022

¶33

7. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

No costs.

¶35

21.11.2025