Syedsirajudeen v. Deputy Commercial tax officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.35500 of 2025 with W.M.P.(MD).Nos.28491, 28493 and 28496 of 2025; decided 15.12.2025 by Justice Krishnan Ramasamy. Petitioner: M/s. Syedsirajudeen (proprietor Syed Sirajudeen), counsel Mr.Selvakumar. Respondents: (1) Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Tuticorin-II Assessment Circle, Thoothukudi (counsel Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader); (2) Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, Mullakadu Branch, Thoothukudi (notice dispensed with). Impugned order: Order No.ZD3309231537167 dated 22.09.2023. Challenge limited to interest and penalty after full recovery of tax; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; writ dismissed, no costs; no precedents cited; no monetary figure stated.
What did the court decide?
Once the tax liability itself has been discharged and in the absence of any sustainable ground explaining the delay or illegality in the impugned order, the question of interfering with the levy of interest and penalty does not arise.