Dismissed¶32

G.Kannadasan, v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC25 Jun 2025WP(MD)/3351/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(MD)No.3351 of 2019; G.Kannadasan v. Secretary to Government Transport Department and State Express Transport Corporation officials (Managing Director, Divisional Manager (Civil), General Manager); Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; writ of mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India; tender for motels/vehicle halts; adherence to tender rules and regulations; writ petition dismissed as infructuous since tender already concluded; no costs; connected W.M.P(MD) Nos.2641 to 2643 of 2019 closed; decided 25.06.2025 by S.M.Subramaniam J. and A.D.Maria Clete J.

What did the court decide?

Since the tender had already been concluded, no further adjudication was required. ¶31

G.Kannadasan, Vs the Secretary to Government — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.3351 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.06.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶8

W.P(MD).No.3351 of 2019 and

¶9

W.M.P(MD) Nos.2641 to 2643 of 2019

¶10

G.Kannadasan ... Petitioner

¶11

-vs-

¶12

1.The Secretary to Government Transport Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶13

2.The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

¶14

3.The Divisional Manager(Civil), State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

¶15

4.The General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Prayer:

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.3351 of 2019

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for

¶21

issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to stoppage of the respondents vehicles only in the tenderer Motels and consequently, direct the respondents to strictly adhere the rules and regulation contemplate under the tender application based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2019.

¶22

(Prayer amended vide Court Order dated 15.02.2019 in WMP(MD)No.2793 of 2019)

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinoth Balan For R1 : Mr.P.Thilakkumar, Government Pleader

¶24

For R2 to R4 : Mr.K.Sathiya Singh

¶25

ORDER

¶26

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

¶27

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to stop the vehicles only in the tenderer Motels and further direct the respondents to strictly adhere the rules and regulation contemplate under the tender application.

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.3351 of 2019

¶31

Since the tender has already been concluded, no further

¶32

adjudication is required. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶33

25.06.2025

¶34

NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm

¶35

¶36