Writ petition challenged cancellation of GST registration. Following Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center, the court set aside the impugned order and directed restoration of GST registration subject to the petitioner complying with the conditions imposed in that decision, including filing returns and paying tax.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 31.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.31033 of 2025
TVL.Yuvaraj Scaffolding Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Sivaranjani Chandrasekar, aged about 28 years, D/o.Chandrasekar, New No.86, Old No.25A, Harvey Nagar 4th Street, Madurai District-625 016.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, O/o The Principal and Special Commissioner - of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd Respondent in Reference No.ZA3301250734112
1/6
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
dated 11.01.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to revoke the cancellation of petitioner's GSTIN.33AABCY6427D1ZJ.
For Petitioner :Mr.B.Rooban
for Mr.R.Veeramanikandan
For Respondents :Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan Government Advocate
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner has challenged the impugned order cancelling GST registration of the petitioner.
3.The learned counsel on either side submit that the issue is squarely
covered by decision rendered by this Court in the case of Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece
Center Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others, in W.P.Nos.25048, 25877, 12738 of 2021 and etc., batch (decided on
31.01.2022), wherein this Court had ordered as follows:
229. In the light of the above discussion, these Writ Petitions are allowed subject to the following conditions:-
i. The petitioners are directed to file their returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, if such returns have
2/6
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
not been already filed, together with tax defaulted which has not been paid prior to cancellation along with interest for such belated payment of tax and fine and fee fixed for belated filing of returns for the defaulted period under the provisions of the Act, within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been already paid.
ii. It is made clear that such payment of Tax, Interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of these petitioners.
iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained utilized, it and etc. batch shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or a competent officer of the Department.
iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed for being utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rule.
v. The petitioners shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies and payment of GST shall also be in cash.
vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority.
vii.The respondents may also impose such restrictions / limitation on petitioners as may be warranted to ensure that there is no undue passing of Input Tax Credit pending such exercise and to ensure that there is no violation or an attempt to do bill trading by taking advantage of this order.
3/6
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
viii.On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith.
ix. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make and etc. batch suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow these petitioners to file their returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine.
x. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
xi. No cost.
xii.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.”
4.Under these circumstances, the impugned order is set aside and the respondent is directed to restore the GST registration subject to the petitioner
complying with the conditions imposed in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center ’s case (cited supra).
5.With the aforesaid observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
No costs.
31.10.2025
NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi
4/6
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
To
5/6
W.P.(MD)No.31033 of 2025
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
rmi
W.P(MD)No.31033 of 2025
31.10.2025
6/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration should be quashed and registration restored subject to the conditions laid down in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and othersApplied
W.P.Nos.25048, 25877, 12738 of 2021 and etc., batch (decided on 31.01.2022)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
TVL.Yuvaraj Scaffolding Private Limited, represented by its Director, Sivaranjani Chandrasekar
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Rural (South)
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
