Saravanan S v. The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition W.P(MD)No.30787 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 30.10.2025 by G.R.Swaminathan, J. Petitioner S.Saravanan; respondents: Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Madurai; Assistant Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Madurai – I Division; Mohan Raj. Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus to act on representation dated 10.06.2025 against respondent No.3. Order is procedural: respondents 1 and 2 wrongly described (originally Commercial Taxes officials), correct descriptions substituted, Registry directed to amend cause title, notice taken by Mr.R.Gowri Shankar for respondents 1 and 2. No merits adjudication, no cases cited, no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
Cause title amended by substituting respondents 1 and 2 with their correct descriptions (The Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Madurai; The Assistant Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Madurai – I Division, Madurai City Range, Madurai); Registry directed to make necessary changes; Mr.Gowri Shankar, learned counsel, takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. No direction on the mandamus prayer appears in the order.