Dismissed¶26

Prr Construction v. The Superintending Engineer (Highways)

Madras HC15 Dec 2025WP(MD)/29854/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as not pressed; endorsement by counsel; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed. Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; challenge to rejection of online tender bids dated 08.10.2025; packages TRY 63, TRY 64, TRY 65, TRY 68, TRY 69; tender notice No. 32/2025-26/SDO; Site Visit Certificate; Working Condition of Plant and Machineries; NABARD and Rural Roads highways tender; Superintending Engineer Trichy; Divisional Engineer Pudukkottai; PRR Construction; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; R. Vijayakumar J.; decided 15.12.2025; no substantive ruling on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Prr Construction Vs The Superintending Engineer… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.29854 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.29854 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD) Nos.23101, 23102, 23104 and 23105 of 2025

¶8

PRR Construction, No.1839/1A, Ambalapuram 2nd Street Pudukkottai District

¶9

Rep. by its Managing Partner Ramalingam ...Petitioner

¶10

¶11

The Superintending Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Trichy.

¶12

The Divisional Engineer (Highways) NABARD and Rural Roads, Pudukkottai Division, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS thereby call for the records relating to the impugned order of rejecting the petitioner's bid submitted by online by the 1^st respondent on 08.10.2025

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.29854 of 2025

¶17

Si.No	Package	Bid rejection Time
2	TRY 63	05.13p.m
3	TRY – 64	05.16p.m
4	TRY – 65	05.19p.m
7	TRY – 68	05.32p.m
8	TRY – 69	05.35p.m

¶18

and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and in consequence thereof declare the bid submitted by the petitioner as eligible to participate in the tender without production of Site Visit Certificate and Working Condition of Plant and Machineries from the 2^nd respondent and further direct the 1^st respondent to finalize the tender process in accordance with regard to the work covered in Sl.No. 2,3,4,7,8 of the tender notice No. 32/2025-26/SDO issued by the 1^st respondent.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader O R D E R

¶20

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

¶21

the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD).No.29854 of 2025

¶25

2. Recording the aforesaid submission and endorsement, this Writ