2014 to consider for promotion, since the petitioner is fully qualified to be promoted to the post of Social Science Instructor and this Court also directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's name for the Social Science Instructor, vide order, dated 02.12.2014. In pursuant to the order of this Court, the 2nd respondent, vide letter, dated 27.02.2015, informed to the petitioner that the proposal of panel list including the petitioner's name has been sent to the Government for the promotion and selection order is awaited. In the meanwhile, the 3rd respondent by proceedings, dated 16.04.2015, has imposed a punishment of stoppage of increment for the period of one year with cumulative effect and the same was challenged in W.P(MD)No.6662 of 2015. This Court disposed of the said writ petition on 24.04.2015 with liberty to file an appeal before the respondents and directed the respondents to complete the appeal within two months from the date of preference of appeal. Accordingly, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent by proceedings, dated 25.11.2015, reduced the punishment from stoppage increment into censure. Again, the petitioner filed W.P.No.32013 of 2016 before the Principal Seat to consider the petitioner for promotion for the post of Social Science Instructor, wherein the Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, vide order, dated 15.09.2016. Thereafter, the 1st respondent passed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim for