J.Jeyasekharan David v. the State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Certiorarified Mandamus; veterinary surgeon pay fixation; additional financial upgradation; G.O.Ms.No.49 Animal Husbandry Dairying Fisheries (AH7) 28.02.2017; withdrawal G.O.(Ms).No.112 dated 05.06.2018; claim based on withdrawn G.O.; writ petition dismissed; no costs; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD).No.12439 of 2017; W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9584 to 9586 of 2017; S.Srimathy J.; Kanyakumari; Animal Husbandry department; Article 226 Constitution of India.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner bases his claim on G.O.Ms.No.49, which was withdrawn through G.O.(Ms).No.112 dated 05.06.2018 while the writ petition was pending, the writ petition cannot be entertained. ¶¶27