Disposed

Manoharan v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC19 Sept 2025WP(MD)/25871/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking a mandamus to survey and demarcate the petitioner's land in Anaippatti village and for police protection. The court directed the Tahsildar and Firka Surveyor to act on the survey request within 12 weeks after notice to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and adjoining owners.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to respondents 1 and 2 to initiate survey action on notice to affected parties, to be completed within 12 weeks; police assistance permitted if necessary; no costs.

Manoharan Vs The Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 19.09.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.25871 of 2025

¶6

Manoharan

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

1.The Tahsildar, West Taluk Tahsildar Office, Dindigul.

¶9

2.The Firka Surveyor, Anaippatti Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul.

¶10

3.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶11

4.Mani ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the the 1st and 2nd Respondents to conducting survey and demarcate my landed property comprised in Survey No. 66/1, Survey No. 66/2, Survey No. 66/3, Survey No. 63/4 situated at Anaipattti village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to provide police protection by considering the petitioner's representation dated on 17.07.2025.

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Harish For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate(Crl.side) for R3

¶16

ORDER

¶17

By relying on sale deed bearing document No.5618 of 2023 and patta No. 542, the petitioner had requested for survey of the land in S.Nos.66/1, 66/2, 66/3 and 63/4.

¶18

2.Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and learned Government Advocate(crl.side) accepts notice on behalf of the 3^rd respondent. Learning Special Government Pleader submits that the petitioner's application would be acted upon within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

3.The petitioner has placed on record the title documents under which he purchased the relevant land. Also on record is patta No.542 standing in the name of the petitioner in respect of S.Nos.66/1, 66/2 and 66/3. Patta No.546 has also been filed and this is a joint patta in the name of one Murugan. The petitioner alleges that the 4th respondent has attempted to interfere with the

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

petitioner's possession and that an order of interim injunction operates against the 4^th respondent in O.S.No.640 of 2024. In view of these developments, it is necessary to put the 4^th respondent on notice before a decision is taken on the petitioner's request for survey.

¶23

4.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of by directing the first

¶24

and second respondents to initiate action on the petitioner's request for survey after issuing notice to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and the owners of the relevant adjacent lands. The entire exercise shall be completed within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If necessary, the revenue authorities may take the assistance of the jurisdictional police. No costs.

¶25

19.09.2025

¶26

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

¶30

RJR

¶31

¶32

1.The Tahsildar, West Taluk Tahsildar Office, Dindigul. 2.The Firka Surveyor, Anaippatti Village, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul. 3.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.25871 of 2025

¶34

19.09.2025

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Manoharan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoharan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kumar Vs The District Collector

Alagarsamy Vs The Head Surveyor

Anandham Vs The District Collector

Karuppannan Vs The District Revenue Officer

Panchavarnam Vs The District Collector

R.Adaikkalam Vs The District Collector