Dismissed¶¶33

Sugam Hospitals v. The Director of Municipal Administration

Madras HC16 Sept 2025WP(MD)/25289/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous writ petition; Article 226 mandamus; pre-decisional hearing opportunity; Madurai Corporation; Director of Municipal Administration; notice Ka.Aa.No.D1/001134/25 dated 26.08.2025; final order by fourth respondent; liberty to avail statutory remedy; Sugam Hospitals; W.P(MD)No.25289 of 2025; dismissed; no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition closed, with liberty to avail the statutory remedy or move the Court again. ¶¶33

Sugam Hospitals Vs The Director of Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.25289 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.25289 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)No.19831 of 2025

¶8

Sugam Hospitals,

¶9

Rep. by its Program Officer, L.Jesuraja, 47A, TB Road, Mehaboobpalayam, Madurai.

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The Director of Municipal Administration, No.75, Urban Administration Buildings, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Chennai - 28.

¶13

2.The Joint Director of Municipal Administration, Nodal Officer, No.75, Urban Administration Buildings, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Chennai - 28.

¶14

3.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation Office, Mela Mart Street, Madurai – 625 001.

¶15

4.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 3 (Central),

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P(MD)No.25289 of 2025

¶19

Madurai Corporation Office, Mela Mart Street, Madurai – 625 001.

¶20

5.The Assistance Executive Engineer (Planning), Madurai Corporation Office, Mela Mart Street, Madurai – 625 001.

¶21

... Respondents

¶22

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to provide an opportunity to the petitioner before passing any order in respect to the notice Ka.Aa.No.D1/001134/25 dated 26.08.2025 issued by the 5th respondent by considering the petitioner's representation and documents submitted by the petitioner.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesan

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.M.Gangatharan, Government Advocate for R1 & R2. Mr.S.Vinayak, Standing Counsel for R3 to R5.

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Heard both sides.

¶27

2.The prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Final

¶28

order is said to have been passed by the fourth respondent. It is open to