Dismissed¶21

M.Muniyasamy v. The Commissioner

Madras HC10 Sept 2025WP(MD)/24315/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; M.Muniyasamy v. Commissioner, Thoothukudi Corporation; retirement benefits disbursement; certiorarified mandamus under Article 226; order dated 19.02.2025 in Na.Ka.No.C1/1483/2024/t.k.; liberty to challenge final order; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected WMP closed; Madurai Bench; K. Kumaresh Babu; 10.09.2025; W.P(MD)No.24315 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final order passed by the second respondent; no order as to costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition (W.M.P(MD)No.19064 of 2025) closed. ¶21

M.Muniyasamy Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.24315 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P(MD)No.24315 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.19064 of 2025

M.Muniyasamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Thoothukudi Corporation, Thoothukudi District.

¶11

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Thoothukudi North Region, Thoothukudi Municipality, Thoothukudi District.

¶12

3.M.Palaniyammal ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the second respondent in the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.C1/1483/2024/t.k.> dated 19.02.2025 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to disburse the petitioner retirement benefits within time

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)No.24315 of 2025

¶17

stipulated by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.N.Anandakumar Standing Counsel

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the final order passed by the second respondent.

¶21

2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the second respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.

¶22

10.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P(MD)No.24315 of 2025

¶26

¶27